Zapruder Inc.

62371 In Iran demonstreren de studenten voor meer vrijheid of tegen de ayatollahs.
In Griekenland heten de studenten opeens links-extremisten en betogen ze tegen de gevestigde orde.

62372 Die Amerikanen hebben dat Cap-and-trade nodig om hun petro-dollar te vervangen. Ze moeten wel, anders gaan ze kapot, net als die petro-dollar.

Het is wel slim wat ze doen...

62373 Thanxs dd,

There was a conference here last week the Venro (Verband Entwicklungspolitik deutscher Nichtregierungsorganisationen) had initialised. A lot of Afghan speakers, among them members of the Afghan Parliament. Mrs.Shukria Barakzai almost pleaded the audience to not believing what the western media was telling their readers. All of them talked about Access to Information, Statistics, Transparency, Partecipation, Freedom of Speech, Aware, Active and Concerned Citiziens, Empowerment, Research, Womanrights, Forecasting, Social Justice, Faith in Democrazy, Legal Support to Democratic Proccesses, Nation Building through Citizien Building and only then the rest: focus on infrastructure, security, employment, healthcare, combatting corruption and drugs. THEY ALMOST SOUND NAIVE WITH THEIR FAITH IN DEMOCRACY compared to us hard-nosed Europeans!

The Afghans are a deeply political thinking society: in the sence of regarding society instead of regarding only the own immediate personal advantage. This people is more political in the original sense of the word than most of the "democratic citiziens" in the Western world. Btw. a fact owed to their religion as well.
But what do we read about them, their political struggle, their ideas, their problems, needs, dreams, ideals? Hardly anything. Whenever you open up a newspaper it's only about military questions. 30.000 more troops will weaken the country even more - and its georgous, wild, smart and enthusiastic people.

62374 http://www.acsf.af/English/

http://www.venro.org/fileadmin/Publikationen/arbeitspapiere/VENRO-PositionspapierAfghanistan.pdf

it's a bit older but the song remains the same...

http://www.medico.de/themen/krieg/afghanistan/dokumente/vortrag-thomas-gebauer/3649/

62375 Op onderstaande website staat een vrij gedetailleerd verslag van de Griekse rellen :

After the Greek Riots (Blog)
http://www.occupiedlondon.org/blog/

Voor meer blogs en websites :

Stay in Touch with the Greek Riots
http://zeroanthropology.net/2008/12/20/stay-in-touch-with-the-greek-riots-and-international-solidarity-actions/

62376 Verenigde Staten: we moeten ons voorbereiden op nucleaire oorlog. China: ruimteoorlog is onvermijdelijk.

Als je dan de docu kijk van Jesse Ventura zie je in deel 5/6 op 3.05 minuten een naar het schijnt officeel document voorbij komen over de mogelijkheden van haarp .
Daar staat dat het gebruikt kan worden om de gevolgen van een nucleaire winter op te ruimen .
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/34435/Conspiracy_theory_with_Jesse_Ventura___HAARP_5_6/

Is er nog hoop ??

62377 En over Europa

Ik denk dat we er in Europa net iets beter voorstaan maar dan alleen omdat de VS als eerste zal vallen , ze hebben ook meer uitgaven dan Europa , enkel omdat de top van de NWO hier gezeteld is . De VS zal als voorbeeld dienen met een grote crash om hier een fascistisch communistisch regime te rechtvaardigen .

62381 Zo, dat was weer het wekelijkse gemopper. Het is bijna grappig dat sommige mensen er genoegen in scheppen om somberheid te verspreiden. Cui bono?

62383 "enkel omdat de top van de NWO hier gezeteld is"

De fantasie gaat steeds verder. Eerst wordt er een 'NWO' verzonnen, natuurlijk zonder namen en rugnummers, en dan zitten ze plotseling 'hier'.

62384

Zo, dat was weer het wekelijkse gemopper. Het is bijna grappig dat sommige mensen er genoegen in scheppen om somberheid te verspreiden. Cui bono?

Cui bono inderdaad ,Dawkins .Dat vraag je je idd af als je ziet op basis waarvan oorlogen worden begonnen

The claim that the rush to war was based - in part - on false information from a gossipy taxi driver is perhaps the most embarrassing revelation yet about the desperate lengths to which the Government went to justify the invasion.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1233995/Was-Iraqi-cabbie-source-dodgy-dossier-MPs-report-claims-intelligence-Saddams-WMDs-came-taxi.html#ixzz0Z44Z0EGN

Niet vreemd dat somberheid dan wel eens de overhand krijgt,nietwaar.Als je je een beetje verdiept loop je nou eenmaal niet tegen de mooiste kanten van het menselijke handelen aan.

62386

Bij Obama weet je nooit of hij het meent of niet, maar de commander-in-chief zegt dat hij ook een punt wil zetten achter het avontuur Afghanistan (alsof het Pentagon de militaire basissen daar gaat opgeven). In 2011 zullen de eerste Amerikanen huiswaarts keren.

@DD
Natuurlijk.

A grimmer view is that Obama has fallen under the influence of conservative military-financial interests, and Washington’s rabid neocons who seek permanent war against the Muslim world.

This week, Gen. James Jones, the president’s national security advisor, asserted, "We have strategic interests in South Asia that should not be measured in terms of finite times." In short, the American Raj will continue to dominate Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Obama’s “surge” may only expand, intensify, and prolong the Afghan conflict. It may also ruin the presidency of a man so many Americans looked to as a savior and inspiration.

http://www.ericmargolis.com/political_commentaries/surging-into-disaster.aspx

Bedankt weer voor de briefing,DD

62387 Het leger maakt een man van je
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16446

"I saw previously strong Marines, people who were now very fragile, deeply weary and broken by one, two or often more deployments, come back and be squashed by their commanders - who told them they were "goddamn losers," Manion told Truthout, "I felt like I was witnessing child abuse. These courageous and fit men go through boot camp, and combat and the incredible duress inherent in deployment, and then you come back and your midlevel command says this to you, and there is a tremendous amount of resentment that builds up there."

According to Manion, doing psychotherapy with soldiers returning with this type of severe complex combat-related psychological trauma "is the psychological equivalent of neurosurgery."

62388 Blair heeft een probleem

An explosive secret letter that exposes how Tony Blair lied over the legality of the Iraq War can be revealed.
The Chilcot Inquiry into the war will interrogate the former Prime Minister over the devastating 'smoking gun' memo, which warned him in the starkest terms the war was illegal.
The Mail on Sunday can disclose that Attorney General Lord Goldsmith wrote the letter to Mr Blair in July 2002 - a full eight months before the war - telling him that deposing Saddam Hussein was a blatant breach of international law.
It was intended to make Mr Blair call off the invasion, but he ignored it. Instead, a panicking Mr Blair issued instructions to gag Lord Goldsmith, banned him from attending Cabinet meetings and ordered a cover-up to stop the public finding out.
He even concealed the bombshell information from his own Cabinet, fearing it would spark an anti-war revolt. The only people he told were a handful of cronies who were sworn to secrecy.
Lord Goldsmith was so furious at his treatment he threatened to resign - and lost three stone as Mr Blair and his cronies bullied him into backing down.

The Mail on Sunday has learned that the inquiry has been given Lord Goldsmith's explosive letter, and that Mr Blair and the peer are likely to be interrogated about it when they give evidence in the New Year.
Lord Goldsmith gave qualified legal backing to the conflict days before the war broke out in March 2003 in a brief, carefully drafted statement. As The Mail on Sunday disclosed three years ago, even that was a distortion as Lord Goldsmith had told Mr Blair a week earlier he could be breaking international law.
But today's revelations show that Lord Goldsmith told Mr Blair at the outset, and in writing, that military action against Iraq was totally illegal.
The disclosures deal a massive blow to Mr Blair's hopes of proving he acted in good faith when he and George Bush declared war on Iraq. And they are likely to fuel further calls for Mr Blair to be charged with war crimes.

The letter caused pandemonium in Downing Street. Mr Blair was furious. No10 told Lord Goldsmith he should never have put his views on paper, and he was not to do so again unless told to by Mr Blair.
The reason was simple: if it became public, Lord Goldsmith's letter could make it impossible for Mr Blair to fulfil his secret pledge to back Mr Bush in any circumstances. More importantly, it could never be expunged from the record as copies were stored in No10 and in the Attorney General's office.
Although Lord Goldsmith had Cabinet status, he attended meetings only when asked. After his letter, he barely attended another meeting until the eve of the war. Mr Blair kept him out to reduce the chance of him blurting out his views to other Ministers.
When Mr Blair is quizzed by the Chilcot Inquiry, he will be asked why he never admitted he was told from the start that the war was illegal.
Equally ominously for Mr Blair, a defiant Lord Goldsmith is ready to defend the letter when he appears before the inquiry. Friends of the peer, widely derided for his role in the Iraq War, believe it will vindicate him.
A source close to Lord Goldsmith said: 'He assumed, perhaps naively, that Blair wanted a proper legal assessment. No10 went berserk because they knew that once he had put it in writing, it could not be unsaid.
'They liked to do things with no note-takers, and often no officials, present. That way, there was no record. Everything could be denied.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16438

62389 @ Dawkins :

"Zo, dat was weer het wekelijkse gemopper. Het is bijna grappig dat sommige mensen er genoegen in scheppen om somberheid te verspreiden. Cui bono? "

Indien het je niet boeit, wat doe je hier dan in hemelsnaam ?

62390 Blijft weinig meer over van Balkenende's argument "naar de toen bestaande inzichten, op grond van het Goldstone rapport en de uitleg van 1441, hebben we de oorlog gesteund".

62391 Is et goldstone raport hetzelfde als de brief van Goldsmith?

62392 Een mooi artikel van Michael Chossudovsky over Climate Change:
Excluded from the Copenhagen Agenda:
Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD) and Climate Change
The manipulation of climate for military use

"Environmental warfare is defined as the intentional modification or manipulation of the natural ecology, such as climate and weather, earth systems such as the ionosphere, magnetosphere, tectonic plate system, and/or the triggering of seismic events (earthquakes) to cause intentional physical, economic, and psycho-social, and physical destruction to an intended target geophysical or population location, as part of strategic or tactical war." (Eco News)

"[Weather modification] offers the war fighter a wide range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary... Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally… It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog and storms on earth or to modify space weather… and the production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of [military] technologies." (US Air Force document AF 2025 Final Report)

Laten we het vooral niet hebben over HAARP, over DU en chemische oorlogsvoering. Het grootste gevaar is CO2. Nou ja!

Dank voor de briefing, Donkerdoorn.

62393 smith...smith...smith......Goldstone is de self-hating jew natuurlijk...

62394 2010 word de bom?
CO2 belasting, 1 europa onder Van Rompuy. We redden 2012 niet eens . Ik zeg rellen in de straten van brussel, voordat de wereld in 2012 vergaat.

62395 Kopenhagen, de emails enz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1UAFRlZtVE&feature=player_embedded

62397 Afghanistan:
Hey, and it's Groundhog Day again:

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/12/06/world/AP-US-US-Afghanistan.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

62398 Democratic Change at work
The Obama administration is turning up the pressure on Pakistan to fight the Taliban inside its borders, warning that if it does not act more aggressively the United States will use considerably more force on the Pakistani side of the border to shut down Taliban attacks on American forces in Afghanistan, American and Pakistani officials said.
For their part the Pakistanis interpreted the message as a fairly bald warning that unless Pakistan moved quickly to act against two Taliban groups they have so far refused to attack, the United States was prepared to take unilateral action to expand Predator drone attacks beyond the tribal areas and, if needed, to resume raids by Special Operations forces into the country against Al Qaeda and Taliban leaders.

A senior administration official, asked about the encounter, declined to go into details but added quickly, “I think they read our intentions accurately.”
“We’ve offered them a strategic choice,” one administration official said, describing the private communications. “And we’ve heard back almost nothing.” Another administration official said, “Our patience is wearing thin.”
The implicit threat of not only ratcheting up the drone strikes but also launching more covert American ground raids would mark a substantial escalation of the administration’s counterterrorism campaign.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/08/world/asia/08policy.html?ref=global-home

62399

Obama denkt de oorlog te kunnen winnen. Met het opleiden van het Afghaanse leger en de Afghaanse politie, en met het “omkopen” van stammen. De zogenaamde Petraeus doctrine, naar de Amerikaanse opperbevelhebber in het Midden Oosten die de strategie met wisselend succes in Irak toepaste (en etnische zuiveringen in de kaart speelde).

Men plukt er tot op vandaag de vruchten van:
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2009/12/200912881156299629.html

62404 Voor wie nog in change gelooft

Citing an argument that hallmarked the Bush years, Obama administration attorneys have asked a San Francisco court to drop all charges against Berkeley law professor John Yoo, who authored legal opinions that permitted the torture of prisoners.

An amicus curiae brief [PDF link] filed by the Department of Justice with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday essentially argues that because he was giving advice to the president on a national security matter, Yoo should not be held accountable for his actions as it would have a chilling effect on advice provided to future presidents.

http://rawstory.com/2009/12/obama-attorneys-step-defense-torture-memo-author/

Wellicht krijgt Obama nu gelijkluidende adviezen van zijn adviseurs,en willen ze niet door een veroordeling van Yoo een precedent laten scheppen,dat hun eigen veroordeling mogelijk maakt?

62405 Militair Industriëel Complex gaat voor ,ook bij griepprik.

Defense contractors got flu vaccine before schools, hospitals: report

Corporate offices at defense contractors and energy companies in Texas received doses of swine flu vaccine at a time when the vaccine was in short supply and the state's hospitals and schools were receiving none, says a news report published Tuesday.

USA Today reports that Bell Helicopter received 100 doses and Lockheed Martin Aeronautics received 80 doses in October or early November, when the vaccine was scarce. Energy companies Chevron (190 doses) ExxonMobil (160 doses), Dow Chemical (170 doses) and ConocoPhillips (110 doses) also received shipments the newspaper says were destined for the companies' corporate clinics.
"Thousands of registered providers — doctors, hospitals, schools, pharmacies — in Texas alone got no doses in that period," USA Today reports.

http://rawstory.com/2009/12/defense-contractors-vaccine/